1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On June 26, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff attempted to purchase killings from the Defendant, but the Defendant sold “New Star,” which is the first agent. As a result of spraying pine trees, the Plaintiff suffered enormous damages by leaving away from the fruit fruits and leafs.

In selling agrochemicals, the defendant should explain the method of use and anticipated side effects to the plaintiff in detail so that the plaintiff can be informed of them and the plaintiff can be informed of them in spraying the first agents. Since the defendant did not explain the method of use and precautions, it is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff.

2. Determination of Gap's evidence Nos. 4, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 5, and 6, and Eul's testimony added to the whole purport of oral arguments, namely, ① the plaintiff alleged that he/she intended to purchase insects from the defendant, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and insects Nos. 4, 5, 5, and 6 are used, so it is possible to easily distinguish insects and first agents since he/she used lids, and Defendant C testified that he/she would be the first agents at the time of sale. ② The plaintiff testified that he/she purchased first agents, insects, etc. from the defendant before, and was experienced in purchasing seconds and firsts from the defendant, and it is reasonable to view that "Syone Star", a lid of lid for a considerable period of time, was the first agents, and ③ the plaintiff's her friendly lids and seconds, not the plaintiff's her friendly lid, and the plaintiff's son's son's Zk's Z.