logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고단1683
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the 2nd century.

On December 3, 2016, the Defendant driving the above vehicle around 23:40 on December 3, 2016, and driving the three-lanes in front of D Driving Schools C in order to drive the two-lanes at a speed lower than that of D Driving Schools in Seoul, New the Road Underground Road in Seoul, and the two-lanes at a speed.

Since there is a crosswalk where signal lights are installed, in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system after checking whether he/she is a person who well sees the steering direction and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the person who is late.

Nevertheless, when the defendant was negligent in failing to perform his duty of care and was negligent in reporting only the straight-line signal of the vehicle immediately, the defendant found the victim E (V, 49 years old) who dried the road late by entering the crosswalk at the right-hand side of the horse with pedestrian on-and-off signals at the right-hand side of the road, but did not stop, but did not stop and got the victim to go beyond the ground floor by receiving the victim as the front left-hand side of the above vehicle of the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as cutting the upper half of the right frame, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment to the victim due to such occupational division and office.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act: (a) the owner of the car in the Do No. B, and (b) the owner of the car is prohibited from operating the car on the road without mandatory insurance; (c) the said vehicle was operated on the road at the date and time specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The CCTV images, images, and explanation to be taken;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

arrow