The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving of COperational Motor Vehicles.

On August 25, 2016, the Defendant, at the time of 05:00 on the 05:00, turned forward the front road to be set up at the Dopum Dop Dop, Dop, Dopcheon-do, which is the 697 Dople-ri.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of due care, such as driving according to the structure and performance of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and failed to accurately operate the steering gear, and caused the vehicle driven by the defendant to be placed before the bridge.

Ultimately, the Defendant sustained injury to the victim D (67 years old) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s occupational negligence as above, due to the fluoral fluor and sloping fluor, etc. requiring approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

B. On April 11, 2017, the victim, after the prosecution of this case, expressed his/her intention not to punish the Defendant.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;