logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.17 2016가단247338
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant's deposit rate of 2.640,00 won deposited by the Jung-gu District Court No. 2837 in 2009.

Reasons

In light of the overall purport of the pleadings, the facts identical to the reasons for the claim in the attached Form 1 to 9 can be recognized.

[Defendant asserted that: (a) it was not confirmed whether the deposited person was the same person as the decedent of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated party; (b) however, considering the overall purport of each of the aforementioned evidence and the purport of the arguments, it is sufficiently confirmed that both parties are the same person; (c) therefore, as to the deposited money as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the right to deposit payment is recognized to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated party pursuant to the attached deposit ratio; and (d) as long as the Defendant contests it, the Plaintiff’s interest in confirmation exists, the Plaintiff

arrow