A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[2019 Highest 2381] The Defendant was in de facto marital relationship with the Defendant in the so-called “de facto marriage” room at around 05:50 on October 7, 2019 when the Defendant’s residence was in the so-called “Seum C” room, the Defendant’s residence.

D 112 Reported 112, Police Officers F (Nam, 24 years old) who was a police officer of the Southern Police Station E police box affiliated with the police station, and asked the Defendant about his personal information and whether the Defendant was assaulted. The Defendant was able to get off the police officer F, who was planned to go up with a sculbr and sculbr.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

[20 order 3371] The defendant and the victim D(n, 54 years old) are de facto marital relations.

On December 15, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30 on December 15, 2020, at the Defendant’s house located in G, and (b) at the Defendant’s house in mobile phone games, the Defendant, while playing a mobile phone game, brought a bodily injury to the victim, such as the victim’s head and side frigate, who would not be well aware of the game.

Summary of Evidence

[2019 order 2381]

1. Statement by the police concerning F of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (in the case of on-site situations), photographs of the parts of the assault damage and the capture of dynamic images (2020 stiffest 3371);

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the Handling of Reported Cases to the Defendant’s legal statement D (the attachment to the victim’s body of his/her body) - the application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the Handling of Reported Cases

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is very negative that the Defendant appears to have repeatedly committed an act of violence against the victim D who has de facto marital relation, even though he had a record of criminal punishment for a crime of violence in the past.

, however, the victim D.