logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.15 2017고단3631
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in a name unsound to “to give KRW 3,500,000,000,000 to the owner of an account by leasing the account; and (b) promised to do so; and (c) on December 14, 2016, through Kwikset’s service, sent a physical card connected to the National Bank C account in the name of the Defendant via Kwikset’s Kwikset’s service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the choice of punishment, and the reasons for sentencing as follows);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s crime of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Criminal Procedure of the Provisional Payment Order is not only an obstacle to the credibility of the safety performance of electronic financial transactions, but also the soil where the phishing crime continues to take place in society.

The fact that the access media that the defendant lent to the criminal organization was actually used for phishing, and the damage caused by it was not recovered is considered to be disadvantageous.

However, the sentencing factors, including the background of lending access media, the amount of damage, the character and conduct of the defendant, shall be sentenced to a fine.

arrow