Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the District Court on 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 31, 2013.

1. On October 15, 2014, around 16:00 on October 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s desire on the ground that, in front of the 2nd parking lot in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, a victim Ethal of the D Management Office (hereinafter “D Management Office Ethical Round,” a victim’s bomb, who was seated on the vehicular road; and (b) assaulted the victim’s breath by

2. In the same place and place, when a victim F, who was employed by the D Management Office F, taken a dynamic image of his/her own boom, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim on the part of the victim, stating, “Chewing, the same youth, and the same bitbit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The application of criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the period of suspension of execution of sentence) and statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors indicated in the instant pleadings.

The Defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case and is in profoundly against the Defendant.

B. The Defendant has been punished 17 times, including the previous conviction in the judgment.

C. The Defendant did not agree with the victims or compensate their losses.