(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.02 2014나9721 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.02 2014나9721

집행문부여에 대한 이의의 소

Text

1. The part concerning KRW 1,293,00 in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and this part of the lawsuit shall be dismissed; and

2. The remainder of the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 4, 2008, the Defendant: (a) manufactured the Plaintiff (i.e., title E: title F: F) as an advertising advertisement at the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch; (b) installed the Plaintiff’s registered trademark “B” on the outer wall of the Plaintiff’s small and medium business building; (c) used the Defendant’s trademark to use the Defendant’s trademark to make it possible for the Plaintiff to go to the general public as the Defendant’s franchise store; and (d) engaged in unfair business practices by taking advantage of the Defendant’s franchise store; and (e) infringed on the Plaintiff’s copyright by placing significant parts of the Defendant’s work “B” on the Internet car page and blo

“On the ground that “ 2008da8449” filed a lawsuit claiming damages (intellectual property rights). 2) On July 15, 2009, the conciliation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was concluded as follows (hereinafter “instant conciliation”).

(b) Article 14 (1);

1. The Plaintiff shall not use the Defendant’s registered trademark and service mark indicated in the attached Form.

2. The Plaintiff does not abuse or publish without the Defendant’s written consent the main contents of “B” the Defendant’s registered trademark and the name of Pakistan, on the website, carpets, and tables opened and operated by the Plaintiff.

At present, with respect to the portion using the term “G” on the homepage, camera, and blog, etc. established and operated by the Plaintiff, and the portion carrying the broadcast recordings contributed by the Defendant’s representative director H, the Defendant shall immediately specify and notify the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff shall delete all of them until July 31, 2009.

5. As the instant damages, the Plaintiff shall pay the Defendant KRW 3 million up to December 31, 2009.

6. The plaintiff and the defendant agree to the above contents for the termination of the instant case, and if the plaintiff in the future violates the above paragraphs 1 and 2, the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant a penalty for the violation by five million won per time.

B. Since the conciliation of this case, the defendant's plaintiff is against the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원동부지원 2014.05.30 2012가단4185

-서울서부지방법원 2018.10.18 2017가합32237

-부산지방법원동부지원 2016.05.12 2015가단18499

-서울남부지방법원 2014.12.18 2013가단66373

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.29 2015가단5364285