The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to the specification of the facts charged, but the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the specification of the facts charged, although the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the charge, although the Defendant did not specify the knife knife in the facts charged, and thereby convicted the Defendant.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. On November 12, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant was dispatched from the Defendant’s wife to the Defendant’s isolation of the Defendant’s wife and children after receiving a report from the police officer affiliated with D District of the Ulsan-dong Police Station D, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, U.S., 204 and 407 on his own residence in Ulsan-gu, U.S. C apartment 204-dong 407; and (b) before being called out to the scene after receiving a report from the Defendant’s wife, E, etc., a police officer affiliated with D District of the Ulsan-dong Police Station D, U.S., dong-gu, Seoul-dong, Seoul-dong, 112-dong, who was dispatched to the scene; and (c) the kitchen knife the entrance of the above apartment and the kitchen knife of the Defendant’s wife and children, which are dangerous things in the kitchen.

Does the death?

“Absing to commit any act that seems to be detrimental to their lives.”

Accordingly, the above E, etc. opened the door door of the above apartment and read the Defendant “a knife and open door” to the Defendant, and the Defendant had a window seeed the above kitchen, which was cited as “a knife and death only,” by “a knife and death.”

Accordingly, the Defendant carried the above dangerous objects and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports.

B. As to the misapprehension of the legal doctrine, the facts charged can be specified by specifying the date, place, and method of the crime.