logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.01.07 2014고단242
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:00 on December 7, 2013, the Defendant’s summary of “D” in Sacheon-si C.

At the main point, under the influence of alcohol, the victim E is able to bleep up the face part of the victim E, which was sitting in the next table, with the hand floor, and use the victim's head debt by putting the victim's head debt in double hand so that the victim's head knife can be extracted as much as the victim's head knif.

2. The Defendant, at around 03:30 on the same day as the statement in paragraph 1, was investigated by the F District District of the Sacheon Police Station at the F District of the Sacheon Police Station, saying, “I am the victim’s background G and Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha am I am I am I am I am am I am am I am am I am am bit I am am I am am am I am am I am am I am am I am am I am am I am am I am am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. A report on the field of the assault case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion about the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 (1), the main text of Article 62-2 (2) of the Probation Criminal Act is insufficient to conclude that the defendant committed the above crime under the lack of ability to discern things or make decisions, in light of all the circumstances, such as the background, means and methods of each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's behavior before and after the crime of this case, etc.

The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing is at the main point of the defendant.

arrow