beta
Text
Defendant
The crimes of the first, second and fifth crimes in the judgment of A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years and six months, and the 5-B of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On January 5, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) at the Seoul Central District Court on January 5, 201, and the judgment was finalized on January 13, 2012.
Defendant
C On May 10, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 6 months of the suspended sentence to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (reconciliationed by Mediation) and was finally decided on January 4, 2014.
[Specific Crime]
1. Defendant A, B, and C’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “AE”) (hereinafter “AE”) (hereinafter “the AE Do Governor”), Defendant A is a person in charge of attracting investment activities, including establishing investment policies, discovering investment companies, and collecting and providing relevant information including promotional activities necessary for attracting investment, and introduction of investment incentives, and providing advice related thereto, from the time when Defendant AD (hereinafter “AE”) operating the AC transfer admission center (hereinafter “the second referred to as “AE”) was appointed by the AE Do Governor (hereinafter “the Do Governor”) on October 18, 2010.
Defendant
B is a person who is engaged in human fisheries in AF.
Defendant
C is a person engaged in printing business under the trade name "AH" in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon.
Defendant
A, B, and C are private joint venture development projects (hereinafter “AK projects”) implemented by a private business entity on or around October 2010 with the rent of 5.1 million square meters from AEdo, and are externally performed investment attraction activities, such as investment companies interference and public relations, as a “investment inducement advisory officer” in charge of investment attraction activities entrusted by AEdo. The fact is that Defendant A performed investment attraction activities by taking advantage of the fact that Defendant A is a part of the ALE Do Governor, that is the part of the ALE Do Governor.