logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.12.12 2019누53060
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

[Supplementary or additional parts] The 4th page 15 of the 4th page “M Regional Headquarters” shall be regarded as the Z Regional Headquarters.

8 At the bottom of the 8th page, “(in particular, F, a representative of the instant meeting, is the age of the deceased, such as the deceased)” shall be added.

(3) On the other hand, the part of the sentence of the second half to half half of the year, "(3) after the end of the above paragraph, the plaintiff argued that D's ground for employing the deceased was to collect up-to-date information about AA Corporation and to facilitate the work of AA Corporation by using a personal network, so it is difficult for the group of this case to readily conclude that the meeting of this case is an occupational group of this case, not an occupational group of this case's second half of the year, since D's officers and employees and the participants of the meeting of this case, F's attending the meeting of this case, as mentioned above, are private group of this case's statements (the statement of evidence Nos. 25, 33, 36 alone is difficult to reverse the credibility of each of the above statements). The fact that D's first half of the year of this case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's case's expense is not an accident's case's case's case's case's accident.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow