1. Defendant C, D, E, F, and G are jointly and severally against Plaintiff A, KRW 196,629,519, and KRW 199,629,519, and each said money.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relationship 1) The Plaintiffs are the deceased M (the 13 years of age at the time of death; hereinafter “the deceased”).

(2) Defendant F and G are the parents of Defendant E (the 14 years old at the time of the deceased’s death); Defendant D is the father of Defendant C (the 15 years old at the time of the deceased’s death); Defendant I is the mother of Defendant H; Defendant K and L are the parents of Defendant J.

At the time of the deceased’s death, Defendant E and Defendant H were in the congested with each other, and Defendant C and Defendant J were in the congested with each other.

B. The Deceased’s assault against the Deceased and the Deceased’s Death 1) around 19:0 on June 29, 2013, around 19:00, the Deceased went to a singing room in the O market as well as Defendant J and Defendant J’s provoking n. At the same time, the Deceased was able to drink 1.8 liters at the convenience store by dividing the Defendant’s 2 and 1.8 liters from the nearby playter, and was under the influence of alcohol. At the same time, N returned home, and the Deceased returned to Defendant J around 23:0 on the same day, and the Deceased was in the vicinity of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government P Apartment 29 (hereinafter “instant sperm”).

(2) At the same time, Defendant J contacted Defendant C with Defendant C, and the location of the instant sperm was known to Defendant C, and thus, Defendant C, E, H, and QV, Defendant E’s East-friendly job-friendly R, S, and follow-up T and U were turned into the vicinity of the said sperm.

Although Defendant C issued a warning to the Deceased that he would not contact with Defendant J of his female-friendly job offers, the Deceased was imprisoned on the ground that the Deceased did not contact with Defendant J and brean alcohol together, and that Defendant J said the Deceased as “I am fright about drinking,” and Defendant E was made a false sexual intercourse on the ground that the Deceased had a sexual intercourse with his former female-friendly body several occasions, and that Defendant E was sexual intercourse only twice.

3) Defendant E and C had the deceased for the foregoing reasons, and around 23:00 on June 29, 2013, Defendant C had first been on two occasions the deceased’s food, etc. (hereinafter “1st.”).