The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant not guilty on the ground that the defendant's act was injured by the defendant's act of the main reason for appeal, and the defendant's act was assessed as a justifiable act despite lack of reasonableness of means or method, balance of legal interests and supplement, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) Around 05:10 on September 24, 2013, the Defendant was on board a taxi operated by the Defendant, including the victim, F, and G, and the victim was first at the passenger restaurant parking lot located in the Gyeongdong-gun, G, and around 05:10 on September 24, 2013, when the Defendant and the victim were in dispute with the problem of taxi fee, the victim was first at the seat of the victim, as the head was frightened by the Defendant, and the victim was frighted, and the victim was frighted in the vicinity of the victim, and the victim was frightened. (2) As the Defendant was frightened, the victim was frightened, and the victim was frighted, and the victim was frighted, and the victim was frightd and frightd.

3 The victims suffered injuries such as 21 days-of-the-counter dump, hump to the left-hand side, hump to the left-hand side, hump to the upper left-hand side, etc.

B. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case

2.(a)

1 The date, time, and place mentioned in Paragraph 1, the victim flabeded the Defendant’s flab, flabed the Defendant’s flab, and flabed the Defendant’s flab, and flabed the Defendant’s flab, and flabed the victim’s chest over the ground floor by pushing the victim’s flab into the ground floor, leading the victim to approximately three weeks of treatment.

C. Prior to the foregoing.