1. The sales contract concluded on January 11, 2017 between the defendant and B shall be revoked.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. In fact, the Plaintiff has a claim equivalent to the amount calculated by the rate of 15% per annum from October 28, 2015 to the date of complete payment with respect to KRW 81,289,141, out of KRW 112,558,32 and the aforementioned money for KRW 81,289,141.

B was missing since February 1, 2011.

B, as of August 22, 2014, C was appointed as an absentee property administrator of B as the District Court 2014-Ma1127 dated August 2, 2014.

C On January 11, 2017, with the permission of the court, entered into a sales contract for selling 2/11 shares (hereinafter “instant real estate share”) among the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by B (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) on behalf of B on behalf of B (hereinafter “instant real estate share”). On January 18, 2017, the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for the instant real estate share was completed in the Defendant’s future.

If the ownership of the instant real estate is excluded as of the date of the instant sales contract, the financial status of B in excess of its obligation as specified in the following table:

The details of the value of active property shall be calculated on the basis of the sum of KRW 112,58,32 won, KRW 39,504,148 in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and KRW 127,290,000, KRW 786,680, KRW 780, KRW 41,780, KRW 35,727, KRW 127,841,595, KRW 127, KRW 127,596, KRW 112,58,32 won x KRW 81,289, KRW 141 x 15 x 15 x 15 x 15 x 35,58,596).

B. According to the above facts, even if the real estate sold by B by C is not the only real estate, it would substantially result in the reduction of the debtor's whole property and the change of B's property status into money easily for consumption or concealment, and the conclusion of the sales contract in this case would result in the omission of B's property status in excess of the debtor's obligation.