(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.13 2015가단178779

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.13 2015가단178779

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant: 114,197,452 won to Plaintiff A; 111,697,452 won to Plaintiff B; and 3,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D is a motor vehicle of the EP (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 10:05 August 15, 2015, around 10:05.

2) On the other hand, on the other hand, the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company, and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company and the driver’s license of the driving company and the steering company

2) The deceased caused the death of the deceased by shocking the front part of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff A and B are parents of the Deceased, Plaintiff C are punished by the Deceased, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract regarding the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 9 through 11, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(ii) evidence of sub-paragraphs B(1) through (4) and the purport of the entire pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is the insurer of the defendant vehicle, who is liable for the damage suffered by the deceased and the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. However, the deceased, as well, did not yield the course by entering the embankment, which is the intersection through which he takes a bicycle, along with the passage of the bicycle, into the intersection. Such errors are deemed to have contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages. Therefore, the Defendant’s responsibility is limited to 50% in consideration of such circumstances.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, it shall be the same as each corresponding item in the separate list of damages calculation.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 2020.02.12 2019가단25974

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.17 2016가단5270790

-대구지방법원 2015.02.06 2014가단24164

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.30 2018가단5201446

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2018가단5220058