logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.14 2020고정58
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 7. 24. 16:30경 페이스북 ‘B’ 페이지에 피해자 C의 스포티지 차량이 게시된 글에 피고인이 댓글을 게시한 것이 시비가 되어 해당 내용이 욕설인지 아닌지에 대한 댓글들이 오가는 상황에서, 같은 날 19:57경 다수가 볼 수 있는 상태로 공개된 피고인의 페이스북 계정에 피해자를 비방할 목적으로 “다수결로 따져보자며~ (중간생략) ~ 이 상황을 즐긴다면서 갑자기 응급실에 정신과치료라니 말이되니~~ 진행 잘해봐~ 나도 나대로 진행할게 ㅋㅋ”라는 글을 게시하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant revealed facts through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on closure data following each page North Korea;

1. Article 70(1) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning criminal facts and Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., however, the indictment appears to be a simple clerical error written

Selection of Fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order. The Defendant and the defense counsel denied the crime that did not include a statement of fact that may impair people’s reputation, but did not contain a purpose of defamation.

However, posting a notice to many public Defendant’s Pest Account that “victims have received a mental therapy” constitutes an act of indicating specific facts sufficient to undermine people’s social value or evaluation, and is identical to the facts charged in conflict with the victim, such as talking on whether some phrases posted prior to the Defendant’s desire or not.

arrow