logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1966. 7. 19. 선고 66다800 판결
[소유권이전등기말소등][집14(2)민,173]
Main Issues

Cases where there were errors in the misapprehension of legal principles as to sharing.

Summary of Judgment

A person who purchased 100 square meters of the land before replotting shall thereafter be the one of the co-owners of the land after replotting in the case of replotting in the amount of 184 square meters to 117 square meters. Thus, a person who purchased 100 square meters of the land before replotting shall be the one of the co-owners of the land after replotting.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 265 of the Civil Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Defendant 1 and one other

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 65Na274 delivered on March 23, 1966, Busan High Court Decision 65Na274 delivered on March 23, 196

Text

We reverse the original judgment.

This case is remanded to the Daegu High Court.

Reasons

As to the grounds of appeal by the Plaintiff’s attorney

According to the judgment of the court below, the court below acknowledged that the land area of 184 square meters was replaced by 117 square meters and 117 square meters of the land site in Busan-gu, Busan-si, Busan-si, Busan-si, which is the land prior to replotting, as the land substitution determination. The court below rejected the plaintiff's claim to the effect that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff purchased only 100 square meters of the land area ( Address 3 omitted), which is the land prior to replotting, 184 square meters of the total land area, 184 square meters of the land before replotting. The court below rejected the plaintiff's claim to the effect that it is unreasonable to determine whether the land ownership was legitimate or not, as the plaintiff's land owner's title was purchased from 184 square meters of the land prior to replotting, 184 square meters of the land prior to replotting as the plaintiff's land owner's 184 square meters of the land, and that the plaintiff's ground of appeal was rejected as 184 square meters of the land's of the land ownership.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating judges.

The judge of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) of the Red Round (Presiding Judge)

arrow