The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. It is unfair that the lower court did not issue an order to disclose or notify personal information to the Defendant, which was unreasonably exempted from disclosure or notification order.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 40 hours of order to attend a course) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse to disclose and notify the personal information of a person who has committed a sexual crime, in principle, to defend our society from sexual assault crimes, there are special circumstances where such disclosure and notification shall not be made exceptional.

only if it is judged, it shall be exempted.

Therefore, the court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the defendant committed an indecent act against the victims who were passengers of a taxi driving by the defendant. The defendant, who was engaged in the cab driving business, committed an indecent act against the victims under the influence of alcohol during the late-time hours despite his duty to safely protect the passengers, and thus, the crime is very poor. <2> The defendant's personal information is disclosed in light of the first crime committed at the same place as the first crime only once the first crime was committed and it seems that the first crime was committed and the case was serious.