logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.11.01 2012고정73
문화재보호법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. If the defendant A finds cultural heritage sealed in the land, seabed, or structure, etc., he/she shall report the discovery to the Administrator of the Cultural Heritage Administration that it was discovered that it was not changed, and shall not transport the excavated cultural heritage with or without compensation, knowing the fact thereof;

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on the first day of November 200, when D, E, and F moved F from the sea to the sea level, from the port of the C, C, E, and E’s equipment for scood ice scood, and lebbbbbbes (air scoodbbes) to the sea; (b) discovered the buried cultural heritage assets of the B, which were buried on the bottom surface of the sea at four meters in the depth of the water, from the point of time to the point of time; (c) discovered the buried cultural heritage assets of the C, C, C, and C, C, and C, C, and C, and C, while transporting them to the sea level; and (d) stored and kept them in the office of G, from the date and time to March 2010.

2. On March 2010, the Defendant received the Defendant’s request from the Defendant’s accommodation located in the G office Ha-si G office’s G office located in Pyeongtaek-si to sell one point, which is a buried cultural property excavated from the seabed, as described in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, even though the Defendant knew that it was buried cultural heritage excavated without permission by the above winners, the Defendant kept the funeral by leaving the above winners to the front of the clothes in the front of the clothes as a newspaper site from around that time to April 16, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocol of examination of witness E (part of the third protocol of trial);

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement against D, E, A, and F;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Report on investigation (site of seizure and investigation of seized articles), report on investigation, and notification of the results of appraisal of each seized cultural heritage and report on the results of digital analysis;

arrow