Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a company with the objective of importing, selling and maintaining motor vehicles, and T is the defendant's business employee who entered the defendant on July 1, 2009 and engaged in the sales of motor vehicles.
B. From March 2017 to September 2, 2017, the Plaintiffs drafted a sales agreement with the Defendant to purchase each of the V vehicles (hereinafter “each of the instant vehicles”) (hereinafter “each of the instant sales agreements”).
The Plaintiffs received delivery of each of the instant vehicles after paying the vehicle price in accordance with the above sales contract (the date of conclusion of each of the instant sales contract, the date of full payment of the vehicle price, the date of delivery of the vehicle, etc. are as stated in the corresponding column in attached Table (3)).
T, from May 201 to November, 201, to conclude installment financing contracts with the Plaintiffs, “U Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “U”) and to enable the loan to be executed, you will pay all of the loans under the Plaintiffs’ name after the lapse of about three months, and pay interest during that period.
“To the effect that it requested the conclusion of a installment financing contract.”
Accordingly, the Plaintiffs entered into a installment financing contract (hereinafter “each installment financing contract of this case”) with U on the date indicated in the corresponding column of the attached list (3). The Defendant was paid a loan equivalent to the respective amount stated in the separate sheet (2) stated in the separate sheet in U as stated in U under the said installment financing contract and payment consignment agreement.
【Fact-finding without a dispute over the basis of recognition, and evidence of Gap 1 through 32 (including all of the numbers except for the separate identification of the number)
hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's entries in the evidence Nos. 1 through 34, 47, 51, and 52, the first instance court and U.S. court's order to submit financial transaction information and the results of inquiry into facts, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Judgment as to the main claim
A. The gist of the parties' arguments 1) The plaintiffs T has the plaintiffs Eul.