logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단247
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the “F A” at the Daejeon Jung-gu E and 1 level, and Defendant B is a person who works as the head of the office from the “F A's main point.”

From the end of September 2014 to January 2015, the Defendants employed a sexual traffic female G at the above virtual point, and had the customer find, the customer receive 150,000 won of the sexual traffic price and enter the same place as a tentatively called 'the other 'the other 'the other 'the other 'the other 'the sex purchase' (H, I, J, and K).

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' statements at each court on the second trial date

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H, I, L, J, or K;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. A criminal investigation report (attaching photographs of a sexual purchaser);

1. A protocol of seizure, a list of pressures, and a general list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea (in the case of Defendant A, the business owner operated a sexual traffic business establishment as an owner of the business, but the business period does not have any record of the same kind of crime, and the time of and reflects on the instant crime, the closure of a sexual traffic business establishment after the control, and the Defendant B, who participated in the instant crime as the head of the business office, but has not been engaged in the same crime, and only one fine due to the instant crime, the fact that the instant crime was committed, the time of and against the instant crime, the fact that the instant crime was committed, the establishment of a sexual traffic business establishment is limited after the control, and all of the conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant records and the trial process, including the following circumstances)

1. A community service order (the Defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (Defendant A) shall apply.

arrow