logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.13 2018고단996
저작권법위반
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is the president of D Private Teaching Institutes in the 3th floor of Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Defendant B is the school instructor of the above private teaching institute employed by the above A.

1. Defendant B shall not infringe upon any author’s property right or property right by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, distribution, lease, or preparation of a derivative work;

On March 2017, the Defendant: (a) stored a copy of the '2018 New High School', a copyright of which the victim Medididid Co., Ltd., using a slickner; and (b) reproduced a copy of the 'veck' using a slickner; and (c) distributed it to 3 students of the click Institute.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed the victim's property right.

2. Defendant A’s employee B committed the above act of violation in relation to the Defendant’s duties at the date and place specified in paragraph 1.

2. Article 141 applicable to the facts charged in the judgment - Defendant B: Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act - Defendant A: Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act: The crime of friendship under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act: The judgment dismissing each indictment against the Defendants of the victimized person on March 29, 2018 after the institution of prosecution under Article 140 of the same Act (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act) (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act)

arrow