Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is a music club proprietor in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si D.

On October 4, 2013, the Defendant obtained permission to engage in food service business from the head of Seocheon-si, the Defendant had from that time, equipped with 19 studio 260 square meters indoor 260 square meters, 16 singing machines and equipment, and operated the business office F, Domin women, etc.

At around 23:00 on November 26, 2013, the Defendant received 8.60,000 won in total, including the drinking value and the secondary commercial sex acts, from two customers G (the male and the 36-year-old age), etc. who find the said music club from two customers (the 36-year-old age), and provided that H (the 35-year-old age-) and the above G, etc. may enjoy entertainment together with those of the said music club, and provided that H (the 35-year-old age-old), etc., of which the said G et al. and the said Do-old female will be able to engage in commercial sex acts, and then, the Defendant promised to have the said G et al. and H (the 504 and 505-year-old women) of the said entertainment club.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is an employee of the defendant, committed the act of arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol of K, L, F, M, or N;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Written statements ofO, P, H, and Q;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure, list of seizure, site pictures and investigation reports;

1. Article 27 and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the claim is that the Defendant did not arrange sexual traffic as indicated in its reasoning, and the F voluntarily arranged sexual traffic, and the Defendant paid considerable attention to and supervised the business in order to prevent F from engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic.