logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.11.01 2018고단1857
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 15:40 on May 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was driving a B B BWz car from the door water distance located in the door water zone at the time of drinking on May 15, 2018; (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not go to the Defendant’s vehicle even though the Victim C (34 years old) driven the D, and XG car changed in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and did not go to the Defendant’s vehicle; (c) in the signal atmosphere, the Defendant threatened the Defendant with the Defendant’s face of the victim who was seated in the driver’s seat two times with the Defendant’s left hand; and (d) caused injury to the victim, such as the dives, fluoral coordinate, salt, etc. in the light of the part requiring treatment between approximately two weeks.

2. No driver of any motor vehicle that violates road traffic Acts shall threaten or threaten another person, or cause any danger to traffic, by repeatedly committing a violation of prohibition against change of course, prohibition of sudden restraint, prohibition of interference with the front, etc., or by continuously or repeatedly committing any act;

In addition, as above, the defendant saw that the victim left the front of his own vehicle, left the door and left the left one lane, followed the victim's car driving ahead of the E E in a short time, and moved to the right side, and he rapidly changed the course in the future of the victim's vehicle, and then the victim was able to immediately move to the right side at the later end of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant committed a violation of the prohibition of career change, violation of the prohibition of speeding, and violation of the prohibition of interference with the future, thereby threatening others or causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. On-site evidence and photographs;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (verification of image of damaged vehicles), internal investigation report (verification of taxi records on the front page of damaged vehicles);

1. Relevant legal provisions and the criminal law of choice for criminal facts;

arrow