The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. The reasoning of the judgment on the facts of recognition and the cause of claim is stated in this part as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or supplementary parts] The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance "E" shall be added to "D".

After the second part of the judgment of the first instance, “the Defendant succeeded to the contract as it is,” the second part of the judgment, “The Defendant purchased the machinery and tools installed in the Seo-gu H ground structure and the above ground building from D on April 20, 2017.”

Each entry of "A through 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)" in Part 3 of the first instance judgment shall be written as a result of the inquiry into the National Health Insurance Corporation of the first instance court about "A" 1 through 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 1 and 2, and the fact-finding into the National Health Insurance Corporation of the first instance court.

Article 42 (1) of the Commercial Act, "B", "Article 42 (1) of the Commercial Act, No. 3 of the judgment of the first instance. 12.

2. The reasoning of the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion is as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written or added.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The third party 17th party 17th party 17th party 1 in the judgment of the court of first instance. The defendant asserts that E is merely purchasing land, buildings, structures on land, machinery, etc., and that he did not take over bonds, debts, etc. arising in relation to the operation of D, and that he did not know that he was liable to the plaintiff at the time of the purchase as follows.

A. The judgment on the assertion that the Defendant was unaware of the existence of the obligation against the Plaintiff at the time when the Defendant purchased the land, building, etc. from D is merely merely purchasing the land, building, ground building, machinery, etc., and related to the operation of D.