logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.10.13 2016가합102325
자재대금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 203,350,778 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 6% from July 5, 2016 to October 13, 2017.

Reasons

1. The name of a joint contractor, the location of the place of business, and the representative shall be as follows:

1. Title: Article 3 (Members of Joint Supply Company) (1) Members of Joint Supply Company shall be as follows:

1. A joint-use construction company;

2. The defendant;

3. A foreign exchange enterprise;

4. Co., Ltd.

5. Construction of east longitude by a limited company.

6. Tyang Construction Co., Ltd. (2) The representative of a joint supply and demand company shall be a joint supply and demand company.

(3) The representative shall represent the project owner and a third party, and shall have the authority to manage the property of the joint contractors, request for the payment thereof, etc.

Article 6 (Liability) Members of a joint contractor shall be jointly and severally liable for the performance of their contractual duties to an ordering agency.

Article 7 (subcontract) Where any member of a joint contractor intends to independently conclude a subcontract, he/she shall obtain the consent of the other members.

Article 9 (Ratio of Investment by Members) (1) The ratio of investment by a joint supply and demand company shall be determined as follows:

1. Co., Ltd.: 40%;

2. Defendant: 35%;

3. Exchangeing corporation: 10%;

4. Co., Ltd.: 5%.

5. 5 percent of east of a limited liability company.

6. Tyang Construction Co., Ltd.: 5%;

A. On November 2009, the Defendant drafted a standard agreement on joint supply and demand (the joint implementation method; hereinafter “instant agreement”) with respect to the construction work of Honam High-speed Railroad No. 4-2 Section 4-2 Section Round and other construction work ordered by the Korea Rail Network Authority among the members of the joint supply and demand headquarters as follows:

B. From July 31, 2013 to November 29, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied a double-use construction company (hereinafter “sub-use construction”) with materials as listed below, and issued a tax invoice.

On July 31, 2013, item 27,207, 400 Materials sale on a temporary basis, 30.63,597,600 Materials sale on August 30, 2013, other than 57,959,00 Bamersh and Bamersh on September 30, 2013, other than October 57, 2013, 200 vinyls, etc.

arrow