beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As regards Defendant B’s KRW 15,000,000 and its KRW 1,000,000 among them, Defendant B shall be from February 28, 2017 to 14,000.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From June 2015, the Plaintiff served as the head of E Hospital’s sexual surgery and division in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around February 3, 2015 to around February 27, 2017, and Defendant C served as the bad faith in the cosmetic and sex center of the above E Hospital from February 3, 2015 to February 27, 2017, and Defendant B is the mother of Defendant C.
B. Defendant B, at around 18:30 on February 27, 2017, came to know of the internal relationship between the Plaintiff and the female employees of the said hospital, and the Plaintiff, upon having known of the internal relationship between the Plaintiff and the said female employees, made and delivered a written statement to the Plaintiff that he/she would have to pay KRW 45 million to Defendant B in total at the end of 45 months between the end of each month and the end of 45 months, in return for the Plaintiff’s internal relationship not to be widened. On February 28, 2017, Defendant B wired KRW 1 million to Defendant B on February 28, 2017.
C. Defendant B sent a text message to the effect that the Plaintiff would not pay the said money, and Defendant B would not pay the said money five times from April 2, 2017 to April 16, 2017, that “if the Plaintiff would not give the said money or the pertinent consolation money, it would be fright to the internal relationship with the Plaintiff and the employees of the said hospital.” However, Defendant B did not pay the money to the Plaintiff.
The Defendants, around 19:00 on April 20, 2017, conspired to receive money from the G Kafff, located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, by means of the above method, to threaten the Plaintiff as if they would have breadth in the Plaintiff’s internal relationship, and the Defendant C was liable to the Plaintiff for stressing due to the Plaintiff’s wrong behavior, and the contents of the Kaof dialogue may be disclosed to the Plaintiff. The Defendant B also could have a width of the Kaof conversation with the Plaintiff. On the other hand, the Kaff, upon receiving certain amount of consolation benefits, the Defendants would be able to complete the match, but would be able to properly width.