logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.09.23 2020가단512883
기타(금전)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant Company B, and the Defendant Company C, jointly with the Defendant Company B.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The cause of the instant claim is the same as indicated in the “Cause of Claim” as indicated in the attached Table (the creditor is deemed the plaintiff, the debtor, and the defendant B (hereinafter the defendant B) as well as the defendant B (the defendant B) had been absent on the date of pleading without submitting a written answer even after being served not by public notice, and thus, it shall be deemed as a confession pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and as to the defendant C (hereinafter the defendant C) as to the whole purport of the pleading, it may be acknowledged by taking into account the entire purport of the pleading in

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff invested KRW 100 million in the defendant B pursuant to the investment agreement with the defendants, and agreed to receive the agreed profit as well as the principal to receive return until August 28, 2019. The defendant C is responsible for the marketing agency for the defendant B's business, the obligation to repay the investment principal to the plaintiff, and the defendant B is liable for civil and criminal liability if the defendant B failed to perform his/her obligation. Such agreement by the defendant C is deemed to be a guarantee for the obligation to repay the investment principal to the plaintiff in the defendant B.

If so, Defendant B is liable to pay to the Plaintiff the principal amount of KRW 104,291,489 (the principal amount of KRW 4,291,489), and Defendant C is liable to pay the principal amount of KRW 100,000 among the above amounts jointly with Defendant C Co., Ltd., and to pay damages for delay at each rate of KRW 12% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from August 29, 2019 to March 20, 2020, Defendant B, who is the service date of the original copy of the instant payment order, from August 29, 2019 to the service date of the original copy of the instant payment order, and Defendant C, from January 23, 2020 to the day of full payment.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants against the defendants is justified.

arrow