The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (four years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. However, the circumstances are recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes of this case and repented his mistake in depth, and that the Defendant is not in a state of health due to the absence of officials in need of both sides, etc.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving victims to require proof of balance in order to obtain the eligibility of a broker for international marriage, study, audience, etc., and by deceiving or deceiving them more than 69 million won in total from victims, but is committed to such attempted crimes. However, in light of the method and contents of the crime, it is very poor that the defendant has been subject to criminal punishment four times of the same crime. In particular, on January 13, 2006, the Busan District Court sentenced 6 years of imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Robbery) at the Busan District Court on September 30, 201 and released on September 11, 201 and was released on May 11, 201, and therefore, 6 years have not passed since it was committed again during the repeated crime period, and since the amount of damage from the crime of this case is large, damage to the victims or the victims to the original sentence, the circumstances, motive and extent of the crime of this case's punishment guidelines, etc.