The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2014, the Defendant, despite the absence of the intent or ability to reduce the transportation fee even if the victim B transported the pipe, ordered the victim to transport the pipe from the Gangnam subway construction site to the Chungcheong budget area, on the ground that “the victim would pay KRW 2.50,00 to the transport cost on the face of the week when the pipe emitted from the underground in the Gangnam subway construction site is transported to the Chungcheong budget area.”

As above, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount as the Defendant did not pay the price for the transport of pipes by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that he/she has no previous conviction and reflects the fact that he/she has suffered damage, the amount of damage is a small amount, and the defendant has paid 450,000 won to the victim and only agreed that he/she does not want the punishment of the defendant);