Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Crosch Rexroth.

On July 11, 2016, the Defendant driven the above van on the 18:36th of July, 2016, and proceeded with the front road D in Seopopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, with the Dong Hong-ri distance outflow.

Since the above road is installed at the time, the defendant neglected to examine whether there are pedestrians or not, while neglecting to do so, led the victim's body part of the victim F (the age of 68) who opened the crosswalk to the left side from the right side of the combined driving direction of the defendant, which was the victim's f (the age of 68) who opened the crosswalk to the left side.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury due to the above occupational negligence, such as the 14 weeks of treatment of the victim, the alley, the left-hand side, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishment: Article 3 (1) and the proviso to (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the

1. Suspension of execution: A suspended sentence shall be determined as per the order, in consideration of the sentencing criteria and the following circumstances on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the grounds of sentencing):

The favorable circumstances: The facts of the crime are recognized and considered to be committed, the fact that the victim agreed smoothly with the victim, and the fact that there is no previous conviction except for the punishment once a minor fine in 197: The degree of violation of the duty of care is significant, such as violating the duty of pedestrian protection in the crosswalk, and the degree of injury to the victim is significant, and other cases: Recommendations are recommended.