Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

Around 10:55 on August 7, 2015, the Defendant driven the above taxi and proceeded to turn to the left the left at the 3-range of the Ari-gu opening of the Sinung-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

Since the location is an intersection where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left due to the negligence in violation of the signal and caused the victim E (the age of 29), who is the driver of the above Obane, to go beyond the floor on the side of the DT 100 Oral Sea, which was going to the front part of the above cab, in accordance with the green straight-line signal from the 3rd-distance flood slope of the Abri-gu Triang-gu Tri-gu.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as mination of the right-side executives in need of treatment for about 14 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (actual survey report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant inflicts a serious injury on the victim by violating the signal, but the criminal liability of the defendant is not weak, but the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his fault, the above vehicle of the defendant was covered by a comprehensive insurance, the defendant did not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten months due to occupational death around March, 1976.