logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.04.28 2015고단17
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant

A A The fine of KRW 3 million, the fine of KRW 1 million for Defendant B, and the fine of KRW 4 million for Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates the fishery products wholesale business in Sacheon City D with the trade name of "E", and Defendant B is a director of the external cooperative project division responsible for purchase, sale, etc. in C with the company located in Sacheon-gu F in Seoul Metropolitan City, and Defendant C is a food wholesale and retail business, sales agency, etc.

1. Any person who intends to carry on the business of manufacturing and processing food A shall register with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without registering with the competent authority from November 1, 2013 to March 1, 2014, employed 7 employees within the above E-work site (3m2), laid down the spawn inside the spawn as raw materials, putting them into the spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, and spawn, spawn, and then made and processed the spawn in the spawn before the workplace, and sold approximately KRW 784 million at the market price of approximately 280 KK per 1 gambling) to C, which is a food retailer and retailer.

2. No person who is not a business operator shall sell foods, etc. manufactured, processed, subdivided or subdivided by persons other than business operators, or collect, manufacture, import, process, use, cook, store, subdivide, transport or display such foods, etc. for sale;

Nevertheless, from January 6, 2012 to March 5, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately 1,880 ambling fish stuffs manufactured and processed by a non-business entity A from the above E and sold and distributed the total market price of KRW 752,20,000 in the market price by subdividing it into about 34,00 won for an unspecified number of people in G main stores, Internet NAVinion, etc. in Daejeon Metropolitan City.

3. Defendant C, who is an employee of the Defendant, had the Defendant do the same act as the Defendant’s business set forth in paragraph (2) above.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow