logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.01.08 2012고정1623
업무상과실치상
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. From March 2007, the Defendant served as a medical specialist in the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the year.

On December 28, 2009, the Defendant performed the first operation on the part of the victim E (V, 55 years of age) who is the patient at the above D Hospital, under the name of the disease of the satch farming and the satch farming and the satch farming and the satch farming, and conducted the second operation on January 13, 2010 for the victim.

As a doctor who directly performed the above surgery, the Defendant had a duty of care to continuously observe the upper part of the surgery and to provide appropriate treatment to the victim E, such as receiving a request for compromise from the negos of the above hospital on January 26, 2010, February 22, 2010, and March 18, 2010.

Nevertheless, the Defendant sent a reply to the above F that the Defendant’s failure to perform the above duty of care remains in the light (the left part of the map and food) of the victim, even though the size of the lux remains, but most of the lux were restored.

Since then, on March 29, 2010, the victim transferred to the Seoul G Hospital and was under the operation for the removal of scarb and scarbly ebbbbbine from the chest and doctor on March 29, 2010, and removed the size and scarbine found in the upper part of the trees, and discharged on April 11, 2010.

The Defendant suffered from the above negligence that caused the victim to extend the treatment period for up to three months.

2. The police interrogation protocol against the defendant among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to determine whether the defendant is admissible as it denies the content of the defendant.

According to the evidence submitted by the remainder of the prosecutor, the defendant performed two times the operation of cutting-out farming in order to treat the e infeasible farming and the efasite farming. However, as the E remains on the part of the surgery, the recovery was delayed after the surgery, and eventually, the H of the hospital after transferring the E to the G hospital.

arrow