1. From May 14, 2015, Defendant Hanyang Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 400,585,115; and (b) KRW 101,00,000 among the Plaintiff.

. Although the owner or sectional owner, who is not a construction expert, specified all the defects that occurred in the apartment of this case, and requests the owner or sectional owner to exercise the right to claim the repair of defects in the same manner as the item of the appraisal document by specifying all the specific items, it is not reasonable, and in light of the location and form of each defect in the defect repair request attached to each of the defect repair applications, such as rupture, water leakage, rupture, and drainage in many places, each of the above defects is presumed to have occurred within the defect warranty period.

2) Determination 1 [Public 45] Determination of the Defendant Union’s assertion on the individual defect items of the Defendant Union’s individual defect items 1] After rupture repair, the Defendant Union’s argument of the defect items were erroneously applied to the rupture painting. Since ruptures were confirmed to have been mistakenly applied, the remuneration charges of KRW 7,121,674 adjusted shall apply. * Since the appraiser made a first appraisal and supplementary reply as to this part [Public 53] revised that the underground parking lot/ its accessory floor-suptains were also wrong, the remuneration charges of this part shall be revised to KRW 807,889, as well as the 807,89, respectively. 2/ [Public 68] Each of the above stairs /EV floor floor floor-type tup/pollution pre-use inspection. According to the appraiser H’s first appraisal and supplementary results, this part of this part constitutes a defect that occurred before the pre-use inspection 3/40% of the rupture 2050% of the rup volume of the report materials.