A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 8, 2015, at around 03:50, the Defendant: (a) received questioning from the slope D of a police box affiliated with the C police box called “5,000 won for taxi expenses”; (b) he was aware of whether the taxi used by the Defendant was a taxi owned by the Defendant, a taxi engineer; and (c) expressed his desire to read “D to receive the fee for taxi for Chewing tymnie,” and “D’s face at one time due to drinking.”

2. 계속하여 피고인은 같은 날 04:00경 위와 같은 행위로 현행범 체포되어 여수시 E에 있는 C파출소로 연행되어 순찰차에서 하차하면서 발로 위 파출소 소속 경사 F의 복부를 1회 찼다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the crime prevention and suppression investigation of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol to G, D, and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant in the area to be mitigated (one month or August) (special mitigation), [decision of sentence] the degree of imprisonment with prison labor for six months: The degree of assault is not serious; the degree of assault is not serious; the circumstances unfavorable to the opposite nature is that there are two police officers in the course of performing their duties and there are many records of violence.