logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고정789
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the charge is the representative of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G to run wholesale and retail business by ordinarily employing 98 workers.

When an employee retires, an employer shall pay a retirement allowance within 14 days from the date on which the cause for such payment occurred.

Defendant did not pay KRW 4,063,588, which was retired from his/her place of business from October 18, 2009 to November 30, 2015, within 14 days from the date of his/her retirement, which was the date when the cause for payment occurred, without an agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable law: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers, and Article 9 of the same Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 Subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (the submission of a written withdrawal of a complaint on November 3, 2016, which contains an intention not to punish an injured person after the institution of the instant public prosecution)

arrow