1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal did not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, except for adding the following arguments to this court, and granted trust that, even if the evidence presented in the first instance court was presented to this court, the Defendant’s transfer agent T, etc. will have concluded an additional loan contract equivalent to the remaining amount on the part of the Plaintiff even if the evidence presented in the first instance court was presented to this court.

The fact-finding and judgment of the court of the first instance, which did not recognize that the act of the defendant's employees, such as T, constitutes an illegal harmful act based on intention or negligence against the plaintiff, seems legitimate.

B. Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the "E" in the second 10th 10th 10th 2nd 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "E"; the fourth 10th 10th 10th 10th 1st 1st 4th 1st 1st 200 "E" is "E"; the fourth 12th 10th 10th 10, and the fourth 5th 12 "E testimony of the witness F" is "each testimony of the court of first instance and this court witness F and this court witness T"; the fourth 13th 4th 4th 19,20, 5th 4th 8, 5th 8, 5th 12th 5th 13th 13th 20 "E" is "E, etc.'s employee," and the second 4th 20th 2015th 2015th 2015.

2. Additional determination

A. M, the representative director of the Plaintiff’s assertion, obtained a loan from the Defendant by offering each land of this case as security. Such a loan contract was made on the condition that the Plaintiff participates in the auction procedure of this case.