Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 9, 2001, H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) was appointed and operated as the representative director of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”), and H was faced with a crisis of default due to illegal blasting, etc. In order to solve this, H’s resignation from the representative director of H on March 3, 2010, and the Plaintiff holding 17% H shares was appointed as the representative director of H.
On October 26, 2010, the Plaintiff resigned from H representative director on October 26, 201 with the N’s consent that the Plaintiff came to know on September 2009 in order to solve problems such as suspension of construction work and renewal of aggregate collection.
B. G is recruited to allow M of an employee in charge of H’s accounting, the Plaintiff’s side of the house, to prepare a written self-statement against the Plaintiff. L on January 17, 2011, L is placed in H office, G is placed in the hand floor of M, and K takes a bath against M on several occasions, and K prepares a written self-statement that “N has sexual relations, etc. with the Plaintiff, and two persons have deducted public funds and personal property from the house.” I and J set up a written self-statement that “N is related with the Plaintiff’s sexual relationship, etc., and that two persons were deducted from public funds and personal property.” L puts down the status of organizational violence while sustaining M in its side, and L puts into pent and pent.
M refused this, G, as a result, had M take the side side of his own gate, had M prepare a false statement of the above contents, and prevented M from leaving the above office for about one hour.
C. On January 17, 2011, G calls the Plaintiff, who was aware of the fact that M was assaulted by G, and confirmed that “the Plaintiff was aware of his corruption and deducted cash and real estate through M,” thereby having his mother returned to the Defendant B’s name, and, if he was aware, Ma.