A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the central station line 9-1 platform located in the 918, as the center of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, on February 18, 2017, from CWD affiliated with CWD upon receipt of a report of 112, and “nickly returning home” from CWD.

In order to hear the word “,” and to bring about a reporter E who was on the side without any justifiable reason, and to bring him into action by the foregoing D, this son was called “I ambling to another feas,” and “I ambling off to feas, I ambling and pushed down the said item D once with her hand, and febbbbling in both hands.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch and protective measures of the above police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement of E and F preparation;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. In full view of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the reasons for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, as follows, and the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, career, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case shall be determined as ordered.

[Unfavorable circumstances] The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant at prices of the police officer who intended the Defendant to return home, and the crime of this case was committed with franchisation and franchisation, and the nature of the crime was very poor, and there is a need to be strict to interfere with the execution of official duties in order to protect the legitimate performance of official duties of the State, and to establish a sound social order (a favorable circumstance)