The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. A. The D Park Council, which was held six times from May 2012 to December 2012, decided to operate the above restaurant, store, etc., was likely to be operated by the team leader. The Defendants had a high possibility of being employed as an employee to take exclusive charge of operating the restaurant, store, etc. of the D Park Funeral. However, the D Park Council, which was held from May 2012 to December 2012, decided to secure the right to operate the above restaurant, store, etc., was not an employee to be exclusively in charge of operating the restaurant, store, etc., at the D Park general meeting of stockholders held around December 2012 after the victims received an investment from the victims. In light of the fact that the Defendants failed to secure the right to operate the restaurant, store, etc., the victims did not have been employed as an employee to take exclusive charge of operating the above restaurant, restaurant, etc., and the Defendants did not have been aware of the Defendants’ intent to engage in the above 400 million won of the above cafeteria, etc., and the Defendants did not engage in the above cafeteria.

I would like to say.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and the court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Each sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (for Defendants, one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The summary of the facts charged was to raise investors in D Park funeral ceremony stores and restaurants in Ulsan-gun C, Ulsan-gun, and to acquire money as investment money.

Defendant

A on June 2012, 201, F.M. in Busan Jin-gu E.