The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: from June 29, 2016 to June 09:40 of the same day, the Defendant found the victim on the ground that the Defendant died of his/her own chickens while purchasing the chickens from the injured party, from the old point of sale of the E market operated by the victim D ( South, 69 years old) and from the old point of sale of the victim D, and from the end of the E market operated by the victim D, the Defendant found the victim on the ground that he/she died of his/her chickens; and

The phrase "h.h." openly insulting the victim.

2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire as stated in the facts charged on the date of the instant indictment, only with the legal statement of F and D with investigation agencies, and with the written statement and written complaint alone, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the following facts: G (a) the wife of the victim and the victim (no person accused of insult the Defendant by the closing date of the pleadings in this case) and the statements made by the investigative agency and the statements made by the Defendant at the investigative agency, the Defendant, on June 29, 2016 (as of the closing date of the pleadings in this case, at least six months prior to the filing date of the complaint) with the victim and G at the store of sales street operated by the victim and G, is punished by G and arguing the defective problem of the pathology purchased by the Defendant at the store of sales street operated by the victim.

G: (a) the Defendant, appearing in the above old point, asked the Defendant to stop insulting G, but it is only recognized that the Defendant, who did not comply with the demand, made the Defendant’s desire to take a part in G; and (b) the Defendant’s desire to take part in G cannot be evaluated as an insult against the victim.

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, it is judged not guilty by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is decided as per Disposition by the public notice of the summary of this decision under Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act.