1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows each evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act in addition to the following cases.

Under the second sentence of the first instance judgment, the part of the “production of a household by using a household, raw materials, etc. in custody of the Plaintiff at the place of business that is operated by the Plaintiff” shall be considered as “the household produced by the Defendants using the materials owned by the Plaintiff and the existing finished products owned by the Plaintiff, which are kept in custody in the instant place of business.”

The 3 to 4 pages of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "after making a household by using the Plaintiff's materials without permission") portion "the household produced by using the Plaintiff's materials without permission and the existing finished goods household owned by the Plaintiff shall be sold."

The 3rd 14-21 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be raised as follows.

“B. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone had the materials owned by the Plaintiff in the instant workplace, and it is not sufficient to recognize that the Defendants removed the existing finished products owned by the Plaintiff from G and H by the Defendants on the date and time of claiming the Plaintiff, and sold them to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants against the Defendants is rejected without examining the amount of damages, etc. [On the other hand, the Plaintiff asserted against I that “the Defendants employed in I by I and J were stolen by taking out the finished products owned by the Plaintiff during the instant workplace from August 19, 2015 to September 5, 2015,” and filed a lawsuit for damages compensation against I. However, “the Plaintiff” in the appellate court.