logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.25 2016고정531
약사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a pharmacist who operates a pharmacy in the name of Gangnam-gu Seoul and the first floor with D pharmacy.

A pharmacy founder shall not store or display drugs for sales purposes, the use deadline of which expires.

Nevertheless, on October 6, 2015, the Defendant displayed drugs for sale purposes, such as a list of crimes, which were manufactured at the above pharmacy with the use time limit of X-ray produced from the parallel restriction, including displaying drugs for which the use time limit of X-ray was passed.

The summary of the indictment on September 15, 2015, 1 X-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The accusation room (the Gangnam-gu public health center);

1. E statements;

1. Written confirmations of F and G;

1. Photographs (the condition of display of long-term medicines used);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (record review);

1. The pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, and Articles 95(1)8 and 47(1) of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act on the selection of a sentence, and the argument that the Defendant’s selection of a fine (the Defendant did not display for the purpose of sale because it was collected by one party or displayed under the same kind of medicine, which was intended to return), but at the time of control, a large number of medicines were displayed in each display stand, and a large number of medicines were opened, and are not deemed to have been displayed under the same medicine date, and thus, the Defendant’s aforementioned argument by the Defendant is difficult to accept).

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow