1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) due to an accident described in No. 2 of the same Schedule based on a mutual aid agreement listed in the attached list No. 1.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff Union”) is a corporation established by passenger transport service providers (excluding terminal operators) in accordance with Article 61 of the Passenger Transport Service Act to provide support for association members to carry out independent economic activities through a mutual cooperative organization and to compensate for damages caused by a member’s automobile accident.

Plaintiff

On October 18, 2014, the Mutual Aid Agreement entered into a mutual aid agreement on October 18, 2014 between G (see subparagraph 1-1 of the Evidence A) and H, a member of the Mutual Aid Association, under Article 5 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, which stipulates that the Plaintiff Mutual Aid Association itself, and the owner of a commercial motor vehicle, shall be liable to compensate the victims (referring to a person entitled to compensation for damage if the victim dies) for the death or injury of another person due to the operation of the relevant motor vehicle.

(See Evidence No. 6). (b)

Plaintiff

On October 31, 2014, around 12:00, the member of the association, who was a member of the Seo-gu Office of Education in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon. Around October 31, 2014, driven a Gstststa New Airport and did not secure the safety distance while driving a three-lane-of-lane-of-face in the city office of education from the negative distance-sides of the city office of education in the direction of the three-lane-to-face, and Defendant B driven by Defendant C and D, who was waiting for the signal in the same direction, tried to find out and stop the first car he was seated, but the latter part of Defendant B was the front part of the said H’s individual taxi. Accordingly, Defendant C suffered the same injury as “Gyeong-do, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul.”

(A) Nos. 1 and 2, and Plaintiff 5, April 5, 2018, refer to the third party’s application for modification of the purport and cause of the claim). 【Ground of recognition’s dispute.