logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.25 2015나2071793
용역비
Text

1. Each appeal filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the principal suit in the judgment of the first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the height between 13 and 14 and 10 are as follows.

According to the facts found above, 50% of the service charges that the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff under the second service contract of this case between the plaintiff, the defendant, and Edddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddg

The following circumstances, i.e., the service amount under the second service contract of this case, finally agreed to bring about 1/2 by the Plaintiff and Eddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddgs, which may be acknowledged by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to each of the statements

Even if the defendant paid the service cost under the second service contract of this case to the plaintiff, the plaintiff agreed to pay the plaintiff 50% out of them to Eddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

arrow