logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.05.08 2015가단72273
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the Plaintiff was damaged by the c hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) from the doctor D while receiving the crypary surgery from the doctor D, and the Defendant is the operator of the Defendant hospital and the user of the said hospital.

B. Around April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the emergency department of the Defendant hospital with a strong right booming pain, and the emergency department doctor of the Defendant hospital confirmed that the size of 6 meters is an essential part of the right breath in the upper right breath of the Plaintiff. Around April 11, 2014, the medical staff of the Defendant hospital, such as D, etc., decided to perform 6 meters of the size of 6 meters after consultation with D, who is a non-urterology of the Defendant hospital. Around April 11, 2014, the medical staff of the Defendant hospital, such as D, breath of breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the 6 meters breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the boo.

3) After confirming that there was damage to the crupt, D attempted to insert the crupt part of the crupt, but the crush was not secured accurately. D opened the Plaintiff’s right-hand lower part of the crush with rhym and opening the trush and trush, thereby confirming that the upper crush and lower crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crupted part of the crush part

(C) Since April 18, 2014 after the instant surgery, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as acute freshitis, and hreshivity with respect to kidney surgery, after photographing CT on April 19, 2014.

D has three claims against the Plaintiff as a compromise with the internal medicine of the Defendant Hospital.

arrow