logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.01.14 2015구합701
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

Around 15:00 on January 20, 2012, the Plaintiff was a driver belonging to Korea-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “non-party company”), while driving a B-si in Ulsan-gu Office of A-dong, Ulsan-gu. Around January 20, 2012, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident in which the part of the penter and the penter in front of the left side of the said taxi is shocked (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

After the instant accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the aftermath of vertebrate, vertebrate disease, vertebrate disease, and other specified vertebrate disease, e.g., e., e., unclassifiedly known e.g., e., chronic disorder of the e.g., g., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e., f., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

On April 7, 2015, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that the instant injury and disease appears to have been caused by the Plaintiff’s king, such as having the same father’s surgery.

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion as to whether the instant disposition was lawful due to the instant accident, but the Defendant’s disposition based on a different premise is unlawful, and thus, should be revoked. The Defendant’s disposition based on a different premise is unlawful.

In fact, the Plaintiff, including the process of the instant accident, was hospitalized in the E Hospital for 4 days immediately after the instant accident, and received medical treatment from the F Hospital, G Hospital, Ulsan National University Hospital, Hhanwon Hospital, Igwon, Jinium, Jinium, Kinsan National University Hospital, Yangsan National University Hospital, L hospital, Samsung Seoul Hospital, etc. after the instant accident.

The plaintiff's automobile insurance was covered by the Dong Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., which shocked the plaintiff's taxi. However, the plaintiff was from January 21, 2012 to January 21, 2012.

arrow