1. Claims established by the judgment of Daejeon District Court on October 9, 2009 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

1. In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant for rent claim under this court No. 2009Gada83378, Oct. 9, 2009, and the above court rendered a favorable judgment in full that "the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff jointly and severally with the plaintiff, the amount of 4 million won and the amount of 20% per annum from September 4, 2009 to the date of full payment, and the amount of 2 million won per month from June 21, 2009 to the date of completion of the name of the real estate listed in the separate sheet". It is recognized that the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case on July 16, 2019, which is ten years after the expiration of the statute of limitations after the above judgment became final and conclusive.

2. We examine the judgment, and seek confirmation of the existence of a judicial claim for the interruption of extinctive prescription of a claim based on the above final judgment, and according to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and recognized as well as the benefit of confirmation.

Therefore, it is confirmed that there exists a judicial claim for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the claim established by the judgment of the Daejeon District Court on October 9, 2009 between the plaintiff and the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.